Mastering the art of building a Security Operations Center (SOC)

Glossary Page

A Security Operations Center (SOC) gathers an organization's cyber-defense expertise into one team. A fully equipped SOC deals with threat detection and prevention. It monitors user activity and access patterns, maintaining policies for critical cybersecurity tasks. This article will explain the elements of a functional SOC and explore how to create one that meets your needs.

Key takeaways

  • SOCs bring together an organization's security expertise in one location. Security Operations Centers can be in-house projects. However, companies can also source external expertise to deliver security services.
  • Core components of a SOC include specialist personnel, security policies, and relevant technologies. Policies should address threat detection, incident response, and vulnerability management. Key technologies include SIEM solutions to manage every aspect of threat responses.
  • In-house SOCs retain control and build internal staff skills. However, outsourcing SOC functions has many benefits. Advantages include access to skills and technology, easy scaling, and cost-effectiveness. Hybrid models that balance internal and external operations are also possible.
  • When building a SOC, focus on assessing its business role. Select the right tools to secure critical assets. Assign roles and responsibilities. Train staff as needed and implement security policies to deliver core SOC functions. Establish policies for continuous monitoring and improvement.
  • Future trends in SOC design include automation and the use of Artificial Intelligence. Companies that invest in the latest threat detection and mitigation tools will enjoy a competitive advantage. SOC operations must always consider long-term improvement.

Understanding the SOC landscape

What is a Security Operations Center?

Cybersecurity is a complex challenge with many technological and policy elements. A Security Operations Center simplifies cybersecurity by gathering together experts and stakeholders in one location.

SOCs can be in-house or externally sourced. In either case, the security operations team monitors digital threats. Team members handle threat detection and create plans to deal with emerging threats. They contain and respond to security incidents. And they constantly update security controls and policies to remain ahead of malicious actors.

The evolution of SOCs: past, present, and future

The evolution of SOCs

SOCs began life in the 1970s as security centers in large government organizations. The US military was an early adopter, creating Network Operations Centers to mitigate primitive code attacks and early forms of distributed-denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks.

Corporations and other public bodies developed SOCs as they came to rely on internet connectivity. Banks built internal SOCs in the 1990s featuring intrusion detection systems at the network edge. However, the modern SOC appeared in the early 2000s.

After 2005, companies and governments started grappling with Advanced Persistent Threats (APT) and malware varieties that could take down entire networks. Regulations like HIPAA also evolved, adding new compliance requirements. The scope of SOCs expanded to meet these needs and protect business assets.

SOCs integrate security information and event management (SIEM) to log security issues and organize effective responses.

As cloud computing grew, SOCs evolved. Virtualized threat surfaces and the widespread use of third parties created novel supply chain risks. From 2010 onwards, high-profile data leaks made cybersecurity an unavoidable priority for businesses worldwide.

Change has accelerated since then. Today's Security Operations Centers counter threats associated with the Internet of Things. Security teams must secure smart devices, remote workstations, and sprawling cloud environments featuring hundreds of apps and service providers.

Fortunately, SOCs now have advanced tools at their disposal. Security professionals leverage machine learning to detect threats and consult global threat databases. Automation reduces human error when managing employee access and delivering policies. The job of the SOC is to make this technology effective.

The inner workings of a SOC

Key components and their roles

A security operations center needs several core components to function effectively. When you confront the challenge of building a SOC, some elements should always be featured.

Personnel

At heart, a Security Operations Center is a collection of skilled individuals. SOC composition varies, but some positions are almost universal. Key officers include:

  • The SOC manager. The manager oversees all aspects of the SOC. They assign projects and assess team performance. The manager reports at C-level and secures resources to build security controls and take corrective action. They take ultimate responsibility when security operations fail.
  • Analysts. SOC analysts carry out threat detection tasks. Analysts use centralized management tools to track the status of critical network and cloud assets. They deliver regular security reports and incident response reports following alerts.
  • Engineers. SOC engineers develop threat detection and monitoring systems. Engineers select appropriate hardware and software solutions to meet an organization's cybersecurity objectives. They should constantly update their knowledge to reflect the ever-changing threat landscape.
  • Operators. SOC operators maintain and operate security tools on a daily basis. Tasks include log management and patching security systems. Operators may liaise with other employees to field security-related queries. They are often responsible for executing diagnostic tests.

Processes

Security Operations Centers are process-driven organizations. They manage security processes to safeguard enterprise assets, constantly assessing these processes and making alterations. Core SOC processes include:

  • Discovering vulnerabilities. Vulnerability management starts with discovery. SOC teams look for security weaknesses for all network assets. This usually involves automated vulnerability scans.
  • Asset management. SOC experts maintain a constantly updated inventory of connected devices and applications.
  • Correcting vulnerabilities. The Security Operations Center must classify vulnerabilities and focus on high-level risks to sensitive assets. SOC members mitigate risks with suitable controls. And they track vulnerabilities over time to ensure continuous protection.
  • Incident management. The SOC responds to security events by identifying risks and containing threats. SOC analysts quickly determine the cause of a security event and take action to limit damage to network assets.
  • Post-incident response. After the incidents, SOC members check that the threat no longer existed. Staff updates security infrastructure to prevent a recurrence. They also integrate lessons learned into cybersecurity systems.

Technologies

A Security Operations Center uses many technologies to mitigate threats and secure data. The mix of technical controls varies between operational contexts. Common technologies include:

  • Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) tools
  • Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) systems
  • Intrusion Detection or Prevention (IDS/IPS) systems
  • AI-based threat intelligence

How a SOC detects, responds, and mitigates threats

Firstly, the SOC specializes in threat detection. Detection systems deploy continuous endpoint protection. Network monitoring tools cover on-premises workstations, cloud deployments, remote laptops, smart devices, internet-of-things sensors, and internet-facing applications.

The SOC also executes threat responses. SOCs respond to alerts by identifying high-level cybersecurity threats and avoiding false positives. Teams assess attack vectors and the targets of attacks. They then respond by closing affected endpoints and quarantining threats. Ideally, this minimizes the impact on network users.

The third technique is threat mitigation. Mitigation can occur before incidents. SOC teams identify vulnerabilities and assess risks. They implement controls to protect high-value assets against the most urgent threats. Mitigation also follows incidents as SOC teams fix weaknesses and improve their security systems.

Exploring different SOC models

In-house vs. outsourced: pros and cons

SOC planners can choose between in-house expertise and external providers. Both options have pros and cons, and select a strategy that suits your organizational needs.

In-house SOC

External SOC

  • Familiarity. In-house experts know local IT infrastructure well. They understand the organizational goals and benefit from connections with key stakeholders.
  • Data remains local. With an in-house SOC, the user controls data storage. This can reduce the risk of data breaches and optimize confidentiality.
  • Flexibility. If you run your own SOC, you can customize its composition and functions. You can source technical solutions without relying on a supplier's preferred tech stack. It is also easier to change security goals as business strategies shift.
  • Skills. The tech sector is notoriously affected by skills gaps. Not all companies possess cybersecurity expertise. External SOC providers supply the skills required, cutting the need to train employees or make new hires.
  • Cost benefits. Setting up an in-house SOC can be expensive. External providers can leverage their existing licenses and skills base to keep costs relatively low.
  • Cutting-edge technology. Third-party SOC providers specialize in running security operations. They focus on analyzing the latest threat intelligence and sourcing up-to-date solutions. This isn't always possible for companies running their own security operations center.
  • Rollout speed and expansion. Enterprises can hire SOC providers and create security systems rapidly. Clients can also expand their operations by purchasing additional capacity. This supports companies as they grow, ensuring consistent security protection.

Hybrid SOCs: blending the best of both worlds

There are alternatives to in-house or internal security operations centers. A hybrid SOC may be a better option for many organizations.

Hybrid or SOC-as-a-service solutions allow companies to choose the services they outsource to specialist providers. Companies can retain control over data and build in-house skills, but they can also bring in external expertise to fill gaps and source new technology.

Hybrid solutions may be more cost-effective for smaller or medium-sized enterprises. They also allow for smooth scaling without handing excessive control to outsiders, cutting data breach risks and aiding compliance.

Step-by-step guide to building a SOC

Every SOC is different. Companies have different business operations, network landscapes, and third-party partnerships. However, the steps below apply to almost all Security Operations Center implementations.

Step-by-step guide to building a SOC

Assessing your organization's needs

Firstly, determine the business role of your SOC. Start by assessing your data environment. Classify assets according to their security and business importance. Develop an enterprise-wide vision of assets needing protection. Use that vision to guide later stages in the SOC design process.

Selecting the right tools and technologies

Understand in-house security systems before selecting technologies for the SOC. Assess existing security tools and policies. Compare current security capabilities with desired security objectives. SOC tools and technologies should meet these objectives and enhance your security posture.

When selecting technical solutions, keep in mind the following:

  • Business use cases for the technology. Do security technologies fit business operations? Can they slot seamlessly into existing workflows?
  • Monitoring and threat detection coverage. Systems should protect critical assets with no loose ends.
  • Automation levels. Can you safely automate most SOC functions? Or do you need more human input to manage security incidents and track network activity?
  • The SOC model. If you outsource completely, selecting technologies is a minor concern. The challenge is selecting a trustworthy partner that delivers relevant services. If you choose in-house security, pick the right blend of SIEM tools and access control systems becomes a critical task.

Training and building a strong SOC team

If possible, use the SOC design process to build internal skills. Inventory staff skills and identify opportunities to upskill employees to perform security tasks. If you hire externally, use skills-based hiring to find employees with relevant skills.

Create continuous training processes for SOC analysts, engineers, and operators. The SOC should be a learning environment that brings on board the latest ideas and technology. Encourage teamwork and information sharing, and work closely with external partners to build robust relationships.

Implementing processes and procedures

Create a security policy library that defines the security processes the SOC performs. Define incident response plans, secure communication protocols, and descriptions of every SOC role. There should be no ambiguity about what the SOC does, what security processes are, and who is responsible for achieving security objectives.

Measuring and optimizing SOC performance

SOCs are dynamic organizations that adapt to emerging threats. Create a set of KPIs to capture SOC performance. Schedule audits to assess security operations. Execute ongoing risk management to ensure security teams stay informed about information security risks.

When and why to consider outsourcing SOC functions

Benefits of outsourcing

SOC outsourcing is a popular strategy with many upsides. Advantages include:

  • Access to skills. External SOC teams draw on specialist talent pools and leverage the latest concepts and skills.
  • Cost benefits. Companies can buy SOC services they need and avoid the upfront costs of in-house alternatives.
  • 24/7 operations. External SOCs can operate around the clock, while internal teams are often limited to office hours.
  • Easy scaling. Organizations can expand external SOC coverage by adjusting their security package. Providers automatically scale up security coverage as businesses grow.
  • Advanced tech. Third-party SOCs source the latest technology to mitigate current threats. Providers maintain and update systems, easing the burden on users.
  • Time-saving. Companies can outsource security functions, freeing internal resources for critical business tasks.
  • Speed. Companies can buy external SOC capacity and rapidly roll out security coverage. Constructing an in-house SOC can take weeks or months.
  • Global scope. External providers draw on client bases and global threat intelligence. They are well-placed to counter malware or exploits as they emerge.
  • Compliance. Expert SOC operators have plenty of experience dealing with regulators. They tailor their systems to meet national or regional data protection laws.

Potential drawbacks and how to mitigate them

On the other hand, outsourcing is not risk-free. In-house systems can be preferable in some cases. Potential drawbacks include:

  • Loss of control. Security tools may not be transparent. Companies can lose visibility over data monitoring and containing threats.
  • Dependence. Companies that outsource can lose internal skills and become dependent on outside expertise.
  • Data breach risks. External partners handle sensitive data, and users must trust providers to act responsibly.
  • Communication. Incident response and threat management require smooth communication. But relations between third parties and user organizations can break down.

These drawbacks are not deal breakers. Companies can create robust communication policies to manage third-party partnerships. Contracts can specify service levels and security requirements. Hybrid SOC models allow firms to maintain internal skills. They can also retain control over critical data.

Integration of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

AI is transforming the way SOCs work. AI algorithms analyze huge data sets to identify potential threats before they become critical. Machine Learning (ML) uses security incidents to improve automated threat detection systems. Behavioral analytics enable granular user monitoring to counter suspicious activity.

All of these tools will become routine in SOC operations. The result should be more accurate threat responses and less work for human analysts.

The role of automation in enhancing SOC efficiency

Automation is the other major trend in SOC development. For instance, automated tools replace manual log analysis. SOC officers can focus on understanding the threat landscape and divert attention from routine security tasks.

Automation is also boosting the efficiency of threat responses. Companies can automate response protocols and accelerate the identification and containment of threats. When combined with ML and AI analysis, automated tools should dramatically reduce the scope for malware and APT attacks — provided companies invest in advanced SOC systems.

Conclusion

Building a Security Operations Center will immediately improve your security posture. But cybersecurity never stands still. Continuous monitoring and improvement allow SOCs to evolve and adapt to future threats.

Carry out regular threat assessments, overhaul security systems before data breaches, and schedule staff training or check-ins with external providers. A well-planned SOC will handle business expansion, changing network architecture, and emerging global threats.