
Anastasiya Novikava
Copywriter
Zero trust & SASE

Tailscale is a popular tool for secure network access, but it isn’t the only option. This article walks through 5 Tailscale alternatives, compares what each one does well, and points out where they fall short, so you can pick the tool that fits your team. Top Tailscale alternatives include NordLayer, GoodAccess, Twingate, OpenVPN CloudConnexa®, and Absolute Secure Access.
Disclaimer: This article includes two types of information, each gathered differently. The comparison table was built directly from each vendor's website, including main pages, feature pages (filtered to display all features), supporting product documentation, and pricing pages. All information is relevant as of June 9, 2026. NordLayer is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of competitor information, which may change over time.
The feature descriptions are based on publicly available user feedback gathered on June 9, 2026, from platforms including Gartner Peer Insights™ and G2. For each competitor, we manually reviewed 10 to 15 user reviews from the past 12 months, prioritizing the most recent feedback on Gartner (where available) and the most recent reviews on G2. Both positive and negative reviews were included to reflect a balanced view, though the number of relevant reviews varied by vendor. Brief or uninformative entries were excluded. As competitor offerings and user sentiment may evolve, NordLayer does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this information and recommends verifying details directly with each provider.
Tailscale is an identity-aware mesh VPN and private network access platform built on WireGuard. It creates encrypted connections between users, devices, and services, using direct peer-to-peer connections when possible and relayed connections when direct connectivity is unavailable.
Organizations can connect private resources through “tailnets,” extend access to existing subnets with subnet routers, and define granular permissions through “grants” and access control policies. Tailscale also provides configuration audit logs and, for eligible plans, network flow logs to help teams review changes and understand how nodes connect across their network.
According to user reviews, Tailscale stands out for these key features:
Users often highlight these benefits:
Users also pointed out some downsides:
Let’s now look at Tailscale alternatives.
Comparison parameter | Tailscale | NordLayer | GoodAccess | Twingate | OpenVPN CloudConnexa® | Absolute Secure Access |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core network model | Peer-to-peer mesh VPN/application networking | ZTNA, business VPN, cloud VPN, remote access VPN, site-to-site VPN | Business VPN/zero-trust access platform with dedicated gateways | ZTNA/VPN replacement with identity-based, direct-to-resource access through Remote Networks, Resources, and Connectors | ZTNA + wide-area Private Cloud (WPC) with full-mesh topology | Security Service Edge (SSE) suite for Zero Trust connections to private apps, cloud services, and websites; Absolute Core is ZTNA with NAC |
Server/network reach | Peer-to-peer mesh; regional routing and traffic steering on Premium+ | Shared gateways in 40+ global locations; speeds up to 1 Gbps | Private Global Secure Network in 35+ locations; gateway performance up to 10 Gbps | Global Relay Network with documented relay cluster locations; Premium Relays on Enterprise; Remote Networks range from 10 to custom by plan | 30+ global PoPs | Optimized for hybrid, mobile, and field workers; specific server/PoP/network reach not mentioned |
Cloud firewall/FWaaS/network access control | Not named as Cloud Firewall; uses ACLs and role-based access control (RBAC) policies | Yes; cloud firewall | Yes; Cloud FWaaS/zero-trust access control | Yes; Identity Firewall, network-level access policies, resource-level access policies, and GUI-managed access policies; not named Cloud Firewall/FWaaS | Not named as Cloud Firewall; has Access Groups, micro-segmentation, restricted internet access, and Cyber Shield | Yes; self-healing client acts as a distributed firewall; Absolute Core includes Network Access Control (NAC) and dynamic policy enforcement |
Device posture | Yes; device posture management, EDR/XDR/MDM integrations, geolocation, custom attributes | Yes; device posture security and device posture monitoring | Yes; device posture check | Yes; native device posture controls, minimum OS policies, trusted device profiles, and MDM/EDR integrations are mentioned | Yes; multi-parameter, continuous evaluation | Yes; endpoint compliance and Comply to Connect continuously evaluate device posture and block unhealthy devices from sensitive apps |
SSO | Yes; SSO with IdP and custom OIDC | Yes | Yes; multiple SSO providers | Yes; single sign-on support, Google Workspace, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, JumpCloud, and other Enterprise IdP integrations are mentioned | Yes; SAML and LDAP | Yes; SAML and OIDC |
MFA/2FA | Via IdP/SSO | Yes; includes biometric authentication | Yes; includes PIN and biometric authentication, enforced MFA | Yes; MFA for bastion host/SSH access and MFA support for any resource | Yes; authenticator-app 2FA for native/LDAP auth | Yes; FIDO2 support through OIDC and NPS-based MFA |
SCIM/user provisioning | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | N/A – not mentioned in the available sources |
DNS filtering/secure DNS/content filtering | Not specified; MagicDNS is for naming, not filtering | Yes; DNS filtering by category and custom DNS | Yes; DNS filtering, Private DNS, Custom DNS Resolver, custom domain blocking | Yes; encrypted DNS, DNS-over-HTTPS, custom DNS filtering, content filtering controls, security filtering controls, and network-level DNS filtering are mentioned | Yes; Secure DNS and content/web filtering across 43 categories | Secure Web Gateway and web reputation/category controls are shown; DNS filtering/Secure DNS not mentioned |
Download/web protection/malware/ threat blocking | Not specified | Yes; web protection, download protection, application blocker, shadow AI detection, Dark Web Scanner | Yes; Secure Web Gateway Lite and threat blocker logs | Yes; DNS filtering blocks malicious websites and phishing, with protection from threats such as malware and cryptojacking; download protection not mentioned | Yes; Cyber Shield with IDS/IPS, malware, phishing, DDoS defense, risk monitoring | Yes; advanced threat protection for zero-day threats, malware, malicious code, and data exfiltration; Enterprise adds multiple AV scans, RBI, CDR, and DLP |
Secure web gateway/SSE capability | Not mentioned | Web protection and download protection | Yes; Secure Web Gateway Lite | Internet Security with DNS/content/security filtering is mentioned; SWG/SSE not named in the available sources | Yes; essential SSE capabilities | Yes; Secure Access is described as SSE; Enterprise combines SWG, CASB, Private Access (ZTNA), DLP, and RBI |
Site-to-site VPN/network connectors | Yes through subnet routers and workload connectivity, but “site-to-site VPN” not named | Yes; site-to-site VPN | Yes; cloud and branch connectors | Connectors provide encrypted connectivity into Remote Networks and are deployed behind the firewall; site-to-site VPN not named | Yes; Site-to-Site VPN | Not positioned as site-to-site VPN; App Connectors for ZTNA across private clouds, data centers, and public clouds |
Cloud network integrations/cloud connectivity | Yes; Kubernetes ingress/egress, Kubernetes API proxy, workload connectivity; AWS Marketplace and Azure named | Yes; AWS, Google Cloud, IBM Cloud | Yes; cloud connectors, provider names not stated | Yes; cloud VPC access and an AWS remote network example are mentioned; Twingate is described as fully cloud-agnostic | Yes; connected networks, AppHub, AWS S3 for log streaming | Yes; access to cloud services and cloud apps is mentioned; named cloud provider integrations not mentioned |
Network segmentation/micro-segmentation | Yes; ACLs, ACL tags, RBAC, subnet routing | Yes; via cloud firewall, gateways, access rules | Yes; network segmentation and zero-trust access control | Yes; least privilege access, network-level and resource-level access policies, Groups, and dynamic enforcement are mentioned; micro-segmentation term not mentioned | Yes; micro-segmentation and Access Groups | Yes; granular access policies, contextual security, NAC, and dynamic policy enforcement are mentioned; micro-segmentation term not mentioned |
Dashboards/monitoring | Yes; services central service monitoring, network flow logging, configuration audit logging | Yes; dashboards, activity monitoring, device posture monitoring | Yes; dashboards and weekly reports | Yes; network analytics, real-time network logs, admin audit logs, log retention, S3/SIEM log sync, Visual Access Graph beta, and DNS log data are mentioned | Yes; Access Visibility, Connection Status, risk monitoring | Yes; over 70 dashboards, 90-day data record retention, deep visibility, and user/device/network/application behavior insights are mentioned |
NordLayer is a cloud-based network security platform designed to help organizations secure internet access, private application access, and network connections for hybrid teams. Its product stack includes zero-trust network access, secure web gateway capabilities, cloud firewall, device posture security, DNS filtering, and identity-based access controls.
Organizations can use NordLayer to connect users to private resources, segment access through virtual private gateways and policies, manage user access with SSO and SCIM, and monitor activity from a centralized Control Panel. The platform is built for teams that need business VPN, ZTNA, and security controls in one service.

Users consistently mention several key strengths when reviewing NordLayer. The most praised product strengths include:
Users often highlight these NordLayer benefits:

According to NordLayer’s website, the platform offers powerful ZTNA features as well as traditional VPN functionality. It combines secure connectivity with granular access control.
Key solutions:

Users mention certain limitations in their reviews of NordLayer:
While these issues do not frequently arise, it is important to consider them.
User feedback emphasizes NordLayer’s ease of use combined with solid network protection.
NordLayer currently holds these ratings on industry review websites:

NordLayer’s plans start at 5 users and, according to its pricing page, include:
Higher plans add broader remote access solutions and control options, such as:
Exact feature availability depends on the tier.

Disclaimer: This information is based on NordLayer’s website and third-party user reviews from Gartner and G2, accessed on June 9, 2026. NordLayer aims to provide accurate and up-to-date information but is not responsible for any inaccuracies from third-party sources.
GoodAccess describes itself as a cloud-delivered ZTNA platform designed mainly for small and medium-sized businesses. It helps organizations create a secure software-defined perimeter around private systems, applications, resources, and networks across cloud, on-premises, and public internet environments. The platform includes business VPN, ZTNA, software-defined perimeter, and secure web gateway capabilities.
Users frequently highlight these strengths:
Customers appreciate GoodAccess primarily for these reasons:
Reviewers also note several areas needing improvement:
Disclaimer: This review is based on publicly available user feedback from Gartner and G2 review platforms, focused on recent user experiences as of June 9, 2026. The information presented here is for informational purposes only and does not imply endorsement or guarantee. Readers should independently verify details before making purchase decisions.
Twingate positions itself as a modern alternative to traditional VPNs. It provides identity-based access for users, services, and AI agents, helping organizations replace perimeter-based VPN access with granular controls for private resources. The platform uses software-based ZTNA to simplify secure remote access.
Users most often highlight these strengths of Twingate:
Reviewers frequently highlight these general benefits associated with Twingate:
Despite these benefits, reviewers noted some common limitations of Twingate:
Disclaimer: This product review is based on information from VPN review sites such as Gartner and G2, along with customer feedback shared on these platforms, accessed on June 9, 2026.
OpenVPN CloudConnexa® is a secure networking and remote access service that helps organizations build a private overlay network across users, applications, networks, and IoT devices. It combines business VPN, ZTNA, site-to-site connectivity, and full-mesh routing through OpenVPN’s worldwide points of presence. The platform supports access policies, user groups, application routing, and identity provider integrations to control private resource access.
Users emphasize these strengths when reviewing OpenVPN CloudConnexa®:
Users frequently highlight the following product benefits:
Although users generally appreciate OpenVPN CloudConnexa®, they cite these drawbacks as well:
Disclaimer: This product review is based on information from VPN review sites such as G2 and customer feedback shared on these platforms, accessed on June 9, 2026.
Absolute Secure Access is an SSE product suite built for hybrid, mobile, field, and remote workforces. It provides secure, zero-trust connections to private applications, cloud services, and websites.
The platform includes ZTNA, dynamic policy enforcement, device posture checks, network access control, and endpoint compliance capabilities. Depending on the edition, Absolute Secure Access also adds a secure web gateway, CASB, DLP, remote browser isolation, advanced threat protection, and AI-powered UEBA notifications.
Users often highlight these strengths when reviewing Absolute Secure Access:
Users frequently mention these overall benefits:
Despite generally positive feedback, users noted certain drawbacks of Absolute Secure Access:
Disclaimer: This section is based exclusively on publicly available user feedback from the Gartner and G2 review platforms, filtered by recency as of June 9, 2026. This information is provided for general informational purposes only and does not imply endorsement, guarantee, or ongoing completeness and accuracy. Readers are advised to independently verify product details directly with vendors before making purchasing decisions.
Overall, the right Tailscale alternative depends on the size of your team, the kind of access you need to manage, and how much hands-on configuration you want to do. Small businesses and lean IT teams that want a simple, cloud-based setup often do well with GoodAccess or NordLayer, since both are quick to deploy and cover the basics of secure access without a steep learning curve.
Mid-sized companies that want a modern VPN replacement with strong identity-based controls tend to favor Twingate, while teams that prefer an all-in-one platform with built-in web protection, threat blocking, and a wide gateway network often pick NordLayer.
OpenVPN CloudConnexa® is a solid fit for organizations that already work with OpenVPN or need flexible site-to-site and hybrid cloud setups, though pricing can climb at scale. Absolute Secure Access is best suited to larger enterprises with field, mobile, or frontline workers who need session-persistent connections and deep device controls, and it tends to be heavier and pricier than the other options here.
Disclaimer: This article is authored and published by Nord Security Inc. as a comparative overview of network access solutions based on publicly available third-party reviews, user feedback accessed and directly from each vendor's website, including main pages, feature pages, supporting product documentation, and pricing pages on June 9, 2026. The information in this article is provided for informational purposes only and should not be considered definitive or permanent. As competitor offerings, feature sets, pricing, and availability may evolve, Nord Security Inc. and its affiliates make no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of this information and recommend verifying details directly with each provider before making any purchasing decisions. We disclaim liability for any errors, omissions, or actions taken based on this information. The inclusion of competitor products does not imply affiliation or endorsement, and all trademarks mentioned are the property of their respective owners. Readers should conduct their own research and seek independent advice before making purchasing decisions.
Subscribe to our blog updates for in-depth perspectives on cybersecurity.