
Anastasiya Novikava
Copywriter
Anastasiya believes cybersecurity should be easy to understand. She is particularly interested in studying nation-state cyber-attacks. Outside of work, she enjoys history, 1930s screwball comedies, and Eurodance music.
Network security
Summary: A site-to-site VPN uses encrypted tunnels to link two or more networks over the public internet, letting every location behave as part of one private network.
Modern companies rarely live in one building. They run branch offices, cloud workloads, and even pop-up sites at events. All those locations share data every minute. If that traffic travels over a public network without protection, attackers can read, alter, or hijack it. A site-to-site VPN delivers a secure connection between entire networks by wrapping every bit in strong encryption.
A site-to-site VPN is a VPN connection that links two or more networks across the public internet using an encrypted tunnel. It relies on Internet Protocol Security (IPsec) or a similar protocol suite to authenticate VPN endpoints, encrypt data, and maintain integrity.
Because the tunnel joins entire networks, people sometimes call it a “network-to-network” or “router-to-router” VPN. The most common deployment connects an on-premises LAN to a branch office network or a cloud VPC.
In short, a site VPN lets multiple sites communicate as one private network even though the traffic crosses a public network. Unlike a remote access VPN, which secures one device at a time, a site-to-site setup secures whole networks through their gateways. It also differs from clientless SSL portals that proxy web traffic, because it preserves all IP-level protocols and allows any application to communicate across sites.
Site-to-site VPNs work best when an organization needs persistent, transparent connectivity between locations. They balance security, cost, and manageability better than leased lines or ad-hoc user VPNs. Consider this architecture in the following scenarios:
In all of these situations, the technology delivers encrypted, predictable paths without forcing every employee or application to change its workflow. By tunneling at the network layer, it blends seamlessly with existing routing and security policies.
Although implementation details vary by vendor, every site-to-site VPN follows the same basic lifecycle. The gateways discover one another, negotiate cryptographic parameters, and then encapsulate traffic so it can traverse untrusted networks securely. At a high level, the workflow looks like this:
Modern gateways refresh keys regularly, detect link failures, and re-establish tunnels within seconds if a provider drops packets. Administrators can run multiple parallel tunnels for redundancy or load-sharing. The protocol suites have been hardened over decades, making a successful cryptographic attack extremely difficult. Because the entire process is automatic, users experience seamless, secure communication.
Site-to-site architectures fall into two broad categories based on who controls the networks on each side of the tunnel. Understanding the distinction helps you choose the right access controls and compliance model.
An intranet-based site-to-site VPN links multiple networks that belong to the same company. A global manufacturer, for example, may connect factories in three countries to its central enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. All traffic stays inside private networks controlled by corporate IT.
An extranet-based site-to-site VPN connects your corporate network to an outside organization. The VPN connection grants the partner access only to approved subnets or services. Careful network configuration, access control lists, and monitoring are vital to protect the rest of your infrastructure.
Many organizations also extend a site-to-site model to the cloud. Public IaaS vendors offer managed VPN gateways that form an encrypted tunnel between your office firewall and a virtual router in the cloud VPC. This approach keeps cloud workloads inside the corporate network without exposing SSH or RDP to the public internet.
Enterprises with dozens of branch office network sites sometimes deploy dynamic-multipoint VPN (DMVPN) or a similar hub-and-spoke architecture. With DMVPN, one branch can create a temporary VPN tunnel directly to another branch, trimming latency and offloading traffic from headquarters. Both options follow the same principles of data encryption, secure communication, and policy-driven access control, yet they scale better for distributed networks.
Deploying encrypted links between sites is about more than ticking a compliance box. It can simplify day-to-day operations, cut telecom costs, and give teams the freedom to place workloads where they make the most sense.
Together, these advantages let businesses expand faster while protecting sensitive data. When paired with modern monitoring and automation tools, a site-to-site fabric becomes an integral part of a Zero Trust network architecture.
Despite their strengths, site-to-site VPNs are not a universal remedy. You should weigh the following trade-offs before committing to large-scale deployment.
Most of these pain points grow with the number of tunnels, so planning for scalability and investing in automated configuration tools early can prevent operational headaches later.
Building a reliable site-to-site deployment is as much a project-management exercise as a technical one. The following steps outline a proven rollout sequence that minimizes downtime and surprises.
For teams without deep network experience, a managed VPN provider or a cloud-based SASE platform offers quicker deployment and ongoing support. These services offload routine updates, patch management, and capacity planning to experts, freeing internal teams to focus on core business objectives.
They also provide unified dashboards that surface real-time metrics, alerting you to issues before users feel the impact. When evaluating vendors, look for transparent SLAs, integration with your identity provider, and detailed audit logs.
Traditional site-to-site VPN projects often take months, require expensive hardware, and depend on specialized teams. NordLayer simplifies this with a cloud-managed secure access solution that combines Site-to-Site VPN, Secure Remote Access, and advanced threat protection in one platform.
Key advantages:
With NordLayer, organizations can connect distributed locations and remote teams under one scalable and secure architecture—without complexity.
A site-to-site VPN permanently links two or more networks through gateway devices. It protects every system on those networks without requiring manual action from individual users. A remote access VPN, sometimes called a point-to-site VPN, creates an on-demand tunnel from one device to a central network. Users launch VPN software, authenticate, and then reach corporate resources.
SASE is an architecture that combines WAN connectivity with cloud-delivered security, including VPN, firewall, and access control. SASE can replace traditional site-to-site VPNs or integrate with them. Many organizations keep IPsec tunnels for key data centers but use SASE gateways to extend secure access to cloud applications and remote workers.
Each location needs a VPN-capable firewall, router, or dedicated appliance. Modern gateways often include acceleration chips for IPsec tunnels. You also need reliable business-grade internet connections and, ideally, redundant power and links for high availability.
IPsec is the most popular because it offers strong data encryption, authentication, and integrity checks. Some vendors support SSL/TLS-based tunnels for specific use cases, and newer platforms provide WireGuard® for low-latency connections. MPLS works at the service-provider layer and can carry VPN traffic, but is not itself an encryption protocol. Most enterprises rely on IPsec tunnels because they interoperate across different VPN devices and service providers.
Subscribe to our blog updates for in-depth perspectives on cybersecurity.